The United States continues to push for taxes on Canadian conifer wood until a tendering system for the purchase of wood is in place in Canada. In the United States, where demand for wood exceeds what local mills can provide, housing construction and other industries depend on Canada for stable and predictable access to quality products. The 2006 Softwood Lumber Agreement (SLA), which provided stability and predictability to industry on both sides of the border, expired on October 12, 2015. Some [who?] in Western Canada have expressed a desire to renew the AMS in its current form, while others are calling for revisions. Some officials in Quebec believe that the province has made the necessary changes to its forestry practices to exempt them from future agreements, much like the Maritime provinces. And some Manufacturers in Saskatchewan have expressed a desire to move to Option A in BC and Alberta, which assesses a higher tax but has no quota restrictions. As a result, as of December 28, 2017, they will be providing U.S. Customs and Border Services with instructions on the imposition of CVD and AD tariffs on all transportation of wood from Canada. The description of softwood and conifer wood products submitted to the reporting program (and excluded) is presented in Section 804. In March 2006, a NAFTA board ruled in Canada`s favour and found that funding for the Canadian wood industry was de minimis, i.e.
a subsidy of less than one per cent. Under U.S. trade law, no countervailing duties are instituted for de minimis subsidies. In July 2006, an interim agreement was reached in which Canada received $4 billion of the $5.3 billion it lost due to additional duty-free penalties. After the initial opposition of several major Canadian wood groups, the Harper government, without specifying the number of businesses it supported, was convinced that there would be enough support to culminate in the agreement. In August 2006, Prime Minister Stephen Harper launched the new agreement for discussion and a possible vote of confidence in Parliament. If the House of Commons had voted against the agreement, it would have automatically imposed a general election and cancelled the agreement. The Conservatives supported the agreement, while the New Democratic Party and the Liberal Party opposed it and left the Bloc Québécois as a decisive party.
(f) those interested in the U.S. domestic market; companies and associations representing more than 60% of U.S. conifer wood production in 2005 submitted to USDOC the irrevocable letters described in Article V and attached to Schedule 5A on the effective date, and the United States has certified that, together, the letters account for more than 60% of U.S. softwood production in 2005; The World Trade Organization (WTO) agreement includes a dispute settlement mechanism; It may be requested that a WTO panel be set up to determine whether a country`s actions are compatible with WTO agreements. Canada has appealed the AD and CVD investigations. In addition, if the importer states that a delivery of conifer wood parcels or kits is exempt in accordance with Section 804 (c) (7), the importer is required to keep the following documentation at the request of CBP and submit it on request: The Softwood Lumber Act of 2008 was created on June 18, 2008 as Section 3301 of the Food Conservation and Energy Act of 2008 (110 P.L.